INFORMATION
ANALYSIS
Evaluation of
Internet Sources
Introduction
Why
Evaluate?
Criteria for evaluating
Internet Sources
Purpose
Scope/Coverage/Comprehensiveness
Authority
Audience
Information
content
Design and
layout
Acces/Workabilitys
Introduction
The availability and growth of the Internet offers all of us, the opportunity
to find information and data from all over the world.
Internet resources, in particular World Wide Web resources, continue to
proliferate at an astonishing rate.
Some experts say that a new site is placed online every 3
seconds!.
It is possible for almost anyone to place anything on the
Internet.
Companies, organizations, educational institutions, communities and individual
people all serve as information providers for the electronic Internet community
This sharing of resources and information is an example of societal cooperation
on a grand scale and has fostered professional and personal communications
throughout the world.
Why Evaluate ?
Why Evaluate ?
When we use a research or academic library, the books, journals and other
resources have already been evaluated by a librarian or by a mechanism set up by
a librarian.When we use an index or a database to find information on any given topic, the
index or database is often produced by a professional or scholarly organization
that selects the journals to be indexed on the basis of their
quality.Every resource we find has been evaluated in one way or another, before we ever
see it.
When we are using the
World Wide Web, none of this applies.There are no filters in
between us and the Internet.Now that anyone with access to a server and a passing knowledge of HTML
(Hypertext Markup Language) can put information on the Internet, the problem has
become one of sifting through a mass of advertising material and vanity
publications in order to find information of high
quality.
Information can be spread
over the Internet by anyone without regard to accuracy, validity, or
bias.Due to its global structure, which encompasses a variety of legal systems and
cultures, it is unlikely any one individual or nation will be able to
significantly influence, regulate, or change the chaotic state of flux that
characterizes the World Wide Web.
So using and citing
information found over the Web is a little like swimming on a beach without a
lifeguard.Hence there is a need for librarians to evaluate Internet information sources in
order to decide whether an Internet information source should be linked to a
resource guide or library Web site.
To judge the quality or
appropriateness of information for a particular query or
user.Many libraries now
maintain Web sites that have lists of Internet information
resources.The development of
subject resource guides is seen as a logical role for librarians, extending to
the online environment the traditional librarian's role of evaluating,
selecting, and organizing published information.It is part of the job of
many of us - librarians or information managers - to select what our users will
find useful from this mass of information.
scope
Criteria for evaluating Resources
Resources should be evaluated on the basis of the
following broad levels of analysis
Purpose
What is the purpose of the resource?
# Resource should make
their purpose obvious at first sight.
# Does the site promote a
product?
# Does the resource fulfill
the stated purpose?
# If a site provides its
own mission statement, the user can verify whether the content matches this
statement
# A good resource will not
be ambiguous and will not deflect potential users, due to its poor communication
of purpose.
1.What subject is covered?
2.Does the resource cover a subject adequately?
3.Breadth: Are all aspects of the subject covered?
4.Depth: To what level of detail in the subject does the resource go?
5.Time: Is the information in the resource limited to certain time periods?
6.Format: Are certain kinds of Internet resources (for example telnet, Gopher, FTP) excluded?
Authority
No matter if it’s a web page,
article or a book, you need to determine who is responsible for the information
and how qualified that person or body is to write on the subject. Don’t accept
words or opinions without knowing something about who wrote
them.
-
1.What are the author’s credentials?
-
2.What is the author's education, experience and/or occupation?
-
3.Is he/she qualified to write on the topic?
-
4.What institution, organization or company is the author affiliated with?
-
5.What organization or body published the information? Is it authoritative?
Audience
|
For whom is the information
being written? Scan the entire work. Check the title, the abstract, the table of
contents, the site map, and/or the index for clues . Popular works are geared toward the general public. Scholarly and trade publications are written for people with specialized knowledge. If you encounter a lot of unfamiliar jargon you may want to use a less specialized source. Accuracy Consider whether the information from a source is presented as fact, opinion or propaganda? Reliable sources make use of factual information that is well-supported. Objectivity & BiasObjectivity means the information is presented impartially with an absence of bias. Sources are rarely 100% objective. An author may present their perspective, however, a forthright author will be honest about his/her bias. A reliable work will also be well-supported. To get a sense of a journal's point of view or bias, look at the names of the authors contributing pieces along with their backgrounds. Check out the focus of several articles within a few issues | |



